Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video110.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Tompkins results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 541.852 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,860 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeffrey Tompkins is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Tompkins
Speaker details
Total words: 110.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
18.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 44.9%44.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos