Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video85.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Lunde results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, In-Group Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 136.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,129 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeffrey Lunde is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Lunde
Speaker details
Total words: 85.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
24.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.3%29.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos