Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Katzenberg results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,618 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeffrey Katzenberg is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Katzenberg
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
27.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos129.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.9%44.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.8%25.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos