Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video84.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Skobin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning, Negativity Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 84.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,816 of 26,841 speakers). This Jeff Skobin is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Jeff Skobin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 84.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
67.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos84.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.1%67.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Burden of Proof: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 19.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos