Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Schaffer results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Ad Hominem, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 272 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,897 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeff Schaffer is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Jeff Schaffer
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
22.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos