Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Benach results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,646 of 26,249 speakers). This Jeff Benach is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Jeff Benach
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos