Speaker summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos160.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeannie Goff results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 160.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,542 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeannie Goff is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Jeannie Goff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 160.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
9.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos160.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos