Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeannie Economos results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 203.712 hits. Analysis detected 1,133.132 faulty-reasoning hits from 794 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,014 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeannie Economos is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Jeannie Economos
Speaker details
Total words: 794
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos794 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos