Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaylen Bastos results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 184.341 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Jaylen Bastos is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Jaylen Bastos
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
28.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos