Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Pitman results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 188.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,833 of 28,364 speakers). This Jay Pitman is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Jay Pitman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
40.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 84.8%84.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 84.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos