Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Cabra Walteros results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,984 of 28,364 speakers). This Javier Cabra Walteros is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Javier Cabra Walteros
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
39.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Red Herring: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 6.0%Red HerringSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos