Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Soroko results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.4% saturation with 58.385 hits. Analysis detected 224.385 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,943 of 28,364 speakers). This Jason Soroko is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Jason Soroko
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
27.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.4%56.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos