Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Bullock results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Self-Serving Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Jason Bullock is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Jason Bullock
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
51.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 43.1%43.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 0.3%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos