Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Alan Snyder results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 47.25 hits. Analysis detected 179.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,019 of 28,364 speakers). This Jason Alan Snyder is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Jason Alan Snyder
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.4% percentile
18.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos148 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos