Speaker summary
37%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Bercegeay results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 68% (9,075 of 28,364 speakers). This Jared Bercegeay is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Jared Bercegeay
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos