Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video12 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Japanese scientists results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 12 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,069 of 28,364 speakers). This Japanese scientists is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Japanese scientists
Speaker details
Total words: 12
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos12 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos