Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video162.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Kamensky results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 107 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,636 of 28,364 speakers). This Jane Kamensky is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Jane Kamensky
Speaker details
Total words: 162.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos162.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos