Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos155.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Moore results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 295 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (25,857 of 28,364 speakers). This Jamie Moore is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Jamie Moore
Speaker details
Total words: 155.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
8.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos155.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos