Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Zirin results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,043 of 28,268 speakers). This James Zirin is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
James Zirin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos