Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video50.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Weingarten results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,542 of 28,364 speakers). This James Weingarten is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
James Weingarten
Speaker details
Total words: 50.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
47.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.5%29.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos