Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Stewart results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 269 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (18,783 of 26,730 speakers). This James Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
James Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
19.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.8%52.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos