Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Reilly results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 29.25 hits. Analysis detected 159.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,534 of 27,299 speakers). This James Reilly is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
James Reilly
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
54.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos