Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Duckett results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 51.9% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 14 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,042 of 28,364 speakers). This James Duckett is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
James Duckett
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
51.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 51.9%51.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos