Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Petr results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 134.842 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Jake Petr is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Jake Petr
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
17.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos