Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video163.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Hoffman results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 77.6% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 163.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,218 of 28,100 speakers). This Jake Hoffman is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Jake Hoffman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 163.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
42.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos163.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 77.6%77.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 54.4%54.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 77.6%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos