Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos130.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Ephros results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.6% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 353.163 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,756 of 27,797 speakers). This Jake Ephros is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Jake Ephros
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 130.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
26.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos130.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.6%59.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.0%23.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos