Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Cole results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 59.3% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 549 faulty-reasoning hits from 216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (17,183 of 26,155 speakers). This Jake Cole is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Jake Cole
Speaker details
Total words: 216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
21.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos216 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 59.3%59.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.5%39.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 59.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos