Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video736.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Thorne results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,135.661 faulty-reasoning hits from 736.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,920 of 28,364 speakers). This Jack Thorne is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Jack Thorne
Speaker details
Total words: 736.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos736.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos