Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video25.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Brewer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 21.375 hits. Analysis detected 99.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 25.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,719 of 26,730 speakers). This Jack Brewer is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Jack Brewer
Speaker details
Total words: 25.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos