Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jace Mataczynski results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 407.11 faulty-reasoning hits from 223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (21,001 of 28,364 speakers). This Jace Mataczynski is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Jace Mataczynski
Speaker details
Total words: 223
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos223 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos