Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivy Wollenzien results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 106 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,814 of 28,364 speakers). This Ivy Wollenzien is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Ivy Wollenzien
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠48%Ivy Wollenzien (selected)31%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos