Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivana Cvijanovic results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 125.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,775 of 28,364 speakers). This Ivana Cvijanovic is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Ivana Cvijanovic
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
30.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos