Speaker summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These İsmail Baykara results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 78 hits . Analysis detected 591 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (14,720 of 28,364 speakers). This İsmail Baykara is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. İsmail Baykara
Speaker details
Total words: 162
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos162 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 46.3% 46.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 48.1% 48.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 33.3% 33.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 35.2% 35.2% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 33.3% 33.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 29.6% 29.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 29.6% 29.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9% Composition/Division: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst