Speaker summary
⁠49%5 analyzed articles/videos291.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isaac Herzog results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 129.734 hits. Analysis detected 274.042 faulty-reasoning hits from 291.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,408 of 28,364 speakers). This Isaac Herzog is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Isaac Herzog

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
28.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos291.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos