Speaker summary
⁠35%3 analyzed articles/videos103.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's Supreme National Security Council results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 67 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,630 of 28,364 speakers). This Iran's Supreme National Security Council is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Iran's Supreme National Security Council
Speaker details
Total words: 103.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
33.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos103.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.5%30.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos