Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (16,889 of 36,035 speakers). This Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠54%Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 134
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos134 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos