Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian government account results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Iranian government account is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Iranian government account
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠94%Iranian government account (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos