Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ira Acree results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,950 of 28,364 speakers). This Ira Acree is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Ira Acree
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos