Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interpol results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 23% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,805 of 28,364 speakers). This Interpol is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Interpol

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
23.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos