Speaker summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These intelligence community results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 102 faulty-reasoning hits from 174 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,095 of 28,364 speakers). This intelligence community is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
intelligence community
Speaker details
Total words: 174
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
29.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos174 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.3%29.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos