Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These inspector general's office results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 331 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,151 of 28,364 speakers). This inspector general's office is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
inspector general's office
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
29.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.0%55.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 43.9%43.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos