Speaker summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos55.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These InfluenceWatch results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Genetic Fallacy as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 313 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 46.6% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,621 of 28,364 speakers). This InfluenceWatch is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
InfluenceWatch
Speaker details
Total words: 55.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
46.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos55.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.6%37.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos