Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inara Alimova results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 355.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 87 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,443 of 28,364 speakers). This Inara Alimova is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Inara Alimova
Speaker details
Total words: 87
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos87 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos