Speaker summary
66%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imam Ali Brigades results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.9% saturation with 43.125 hits. Analysis detected 137.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (10,613 of 28,364 speakers). This Imam Ali Brigades is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Imam Ali Brigades
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
46.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 41.9%41.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.9%66.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.9%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos