Speaker summary
â 95% 1 analyzed article/video 64.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilene Mitnick results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 64.5 hits . Analysis detected 238.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of â 62% (10,834 of 28,364 speakers). This Ilene Mitnick is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Ilene Mitnick
Speaker details
Total words: 64.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 45.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos64.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 100.0% 100.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 51.2% 51.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 38.4% 38.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 48.8% 48.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 48.8% 48.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 51.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst