Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These IFJ results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 337 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,233 of 28,364 speakers). This IFJ is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
IFJ
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
49.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 56.1%56.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.9%43.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos