Speaker summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos64.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These IDC results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 97 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 45.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,842 of 28,364 speakers). This IDC is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
IDC
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 64.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos64.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 62.2%62.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.6%36.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 62.2%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos