Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video136.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ibram X. Kendi results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Confirmation Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 85 faulty-reasoning hits from 136.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,099 of 28,364 speakers). This Ibram X. Kendi is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Ibram X. Kendi
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠15%Ibram X. Kendi (selected)12%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 136.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos136.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos