Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hydro spokesperson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 92.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,480 of 28,364 speakers). This Hydro spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Hydro spokesperson
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
47.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 92.3%92.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 84.6%84.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 84.6%84.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 92.3%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 84.6%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 84.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos