Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video115.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hudson Institute results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 401.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (17,133 of 26,731 speakers). This Hudson Institute is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Hudson Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 115.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos115.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 43.7%43.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos